« December 2007 | Main | February 2008 »

January 31, 2008

HR Resources 101

Check out this blog that covers a wide range of HR issues.

World News: UK - Three Types of Engagement

CIPDlogo.gif

We all know about the Gallup Q12 methodology. But how many people have ever heard of the CIPD (The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development) in the United Kingdom? If you haven’t and you are serious about driving employee engagement at your company, you may want to have a look.

In 2006, the CIPD outlined that employee engagement is actually comprised of three components:
  1. Cognitive engagement - focusing very hard on work, thinking about very little else during the working day.
  2. Emotional engagement - being involved emotionally with your work.
  3. Physical engagement - being willing to 'go the extra mile' for your employer and work over and beyond contract.

This breakdown provides a very interesting way to look at engagement and the behaviours that feed into engagement and how they impact on overall engagement levels. 

What are the components of Cognitive Engagement?

When CIPD measured cognitive engagement levels they posed four questions to employees:
    • Time passes quickly when I perform my job.
    • I often think about other things when performing my job.
    • I am rarely distracted when performing my job.
    • Performing my job is so absorbing that I forget about everything else.

The Results:

Only 31 per cent of respondents were found to be cognitively engaged and 22 per cent were disengaged. This is the area that scored the lowest in terms the percentage of respondents that were engaged and committed. 
 

What are the components of Emotional Engagement?

When CIPD measured emotional engagement they posed four questions to employees:
    • My own feelings are affected by how well I perform my job.
    • I really put my heart into my job.
    • I get excited when I perform well in my job.
    • I often feel emotionally detached from the job.

The Results:

58 per cent of respondents were found to be emotionally engaged with their work and only 6% are emotionally disengaged.

What are the components of Physical Engagement?

When CIPD measured physical engagement they posed five questions to employees:
    • I stay until the job is done.
    • I exert a lot of energy performing my job.
    • I take work home to do.
    • I avoid working overtime whenever possible.
    • I avoid working too hard.

The Results:

38 per cent of respondents were found to be physically engaged with their work, whilst 11% are physically disengaged. 

The key to driving employee engagement, regardless of the questions asked, is how the results are taken forward and put into action.

 

 

January 30, 2008

ANZ Knows Engagement Levels - Do You?

PieCHart.gif 

Do you know how many of your employees are willing to be advocates for your business, are committed to staying with you, and are motivated to contribute their best to your organization every day? Could you map how many of your employees are high performers?
 

ANZ Bank in Australia can. According to the ANZ website, global human resources firm, Hewitt Associates, estimates that every 'engaged' employee is worth about $5,000 each year in additional profit. Its research shows that companies that score 60% or higher have an average five-year shareholder return of 20.2%.

Every year, ANZ conducts an annual Engagement and Culture Survey that measures progress towards engaging their people and building a values-driven culture. The Survey is conducted with Hewitt Associates and Cultural Transformation Tools and provides an opportunity for all ANZ employees to have their say. The results give the Bank insight into their employees’ views on what it’s like to work at ANZ, as well as issues ranging from leadership to corporate responsibility to individual opportunities for career development and progression.

So where does ANZ stand? The engagement score increased from 60% in 2006 to 64% in 2007. 
What were some of the specific results?
  • This organization takes its societal responsibilities seriously - 75%
  • This organization takes its environmental responsibilities seriously - 65%
  • We are making a positive difference in the community - 70%
  • I value the opportunity this organization provides for me to make a personal contribution to my community - 71%
  • People in this organization take corrective action if standards of behaviour fall below the levels set by our business principles and values - 62%
  • People in this organization maintain high standards of ethics and integrity - 69%.

What does ANZ do with the results?

The Bank identifies specific actions that can be taken to improve ANZ’s levels of engagement and culture, and subsequently, employees’ experience at work

How many companies are truly measuring employee engagement levels? If your company isn’t doing it – maybe you should point them to what ANZ in Australia is doing!

Google is #1 Again!

google_logo.jpgGoogle tops Fortune’s “100 Best Companies To Work For” 2008 list. That’s number one for the second year running and it seems to me that you can’t be number one unless you have a happy and engaged workforce.

After all, as part of the selection procedure, 400 employees (selected at random) had to answer a 57-question survey that covered the gamut from job satisfaction to management attitudes.

So how does Google do it?

Is it the perks? There is no denying that the perks are amazing – from the stock options, to the opportunity to spend 20 per cent  of your time working on special projects, the free gym, laundry, car wash, day care, concierge and free delectable food and gourmet snacks, to name just a few are all very attractive.  

But perks alone don’t create a great company. So what is it that makes Google dominate?

At the Employee Factor, we think that Google’s success can be attributed to a corporate philosophy and culture that permeates the organization and engages and inspires all who come into contact with the company.After a quick Google search, we hit upon the Google Jobs website to find some insight and it was here that we found a list that confirmed our belief that it is the culture that sets this company apart.

This is a condensed version.

The Top 10 Reasons To Work At Google
  • Lend a helping hand.
  • Life is beautiful.
  • Appreciation is the best motivation.
  • Work and play are not mutually exclusive.
  • We love our employees, and we want them to know it.
  • Innovation is our bloodline.
  • Good company everywhere you look.
  • Uniting the world, one user at a time.
  • Boldly go where no one has gone before.
  • There is such a thing as a free lunch after all.

Now, that’s one engaging list. Now, who wouldn’t want to work at Google!

January 29, 2008

To Cull or Not to Cull Bottom Performers

turkey.jpg“If you’ve got 16 employees, at least two are turkeys.” Jack Welch

Jack Welch famously advocated firing the bottom-performing 10 per cent of staff every year. So did Steve Ballmer in April 2006, who admitted to culling one in every 15 employees every year and suggested that all businesses, large and small, would benefit from such an approach. The question – what should companies do to manage their low performers? Low performers are said to make up one tenth of a company’s workforce. In addition to implementing a clear process to handle poor performers, there is another very controversial method to manage the bottom 10 per cent…implement an annual quota for removing underperforming staff.

The latest research from Hudson Recruitment shows that UK business leaders do want to dismiss an annual quota of underperforming staff. The findings reveal that 61% of senior UK bosses believe that a fixed target for annual staff dismissal is healthy.

According to the study, British business leaders acknowledged that there were distinct advantages to deliberately releasing average or below-average performers.
  • Ensuring strong team members do not carry weaker ones was cited as the main advantage (60%) of deliberately releasing average or below average performers.
  • Allowing underperforming staff to pursue a fresh challenge more suited to their abilities (50%).
  • Bottom-line improvement (36%).
  • Ensuring that training is spent on those that will really benefit (35%).
  • Increasing productivity (33%) also rated highly.
But the risks inherent to this strategy were also highlighted:
  • 75% of respondents cited ‘introducing a culture of fear’ as a deterrent to a dismissal quota.
  • 61% felt pursuing such a dismissal policy would lower morale within the workplace.
  • Just over 10% think that it will decrease motivation in the workplace.

While it was agreed that there are risks to this strategy, the problems associated with inaction may outweigh the risks.

Are you in favor of culling? Let us know your thoughts.

 

January 28, 2008

Rule #8 - Deal With Any "Bad Apples"

badapple.jpgThink about it for a moment – how many poor performers exist in your organization? Do you know who they are? How does it impact your morale and those around you?  How effective is your organization at dealing with poor performers?

Unfortunately, poor performers lurk in every corporate office, in every branch, and on every factory floor. Research shows that the impact of poor performers on an organization can be dramatic. The IRS research shows that under-performing employees are more likely to be absent from work, fail to meet their work objectives, and have generally lower standards of work than their colleagues. And, most HR practitioners also report that poor performers frequently do less, miss deadlines and have a poor attitude to their colleagues. How an organization deals with poor performers is considered a measure of how well the organization is managed and led and is critical to creating an environment that is characterized by engaged and committed employees. So what can your company do to ensure that poor performers don’t impact employee morale, and the overall performance of your organization? Develop a Process to Handle Poor Performance – In order for poor performance issues to be effectively addressed, a company must have a process to handle poor performers. That process must be clearly communicated to all of your Leaders. Every Leader must be trained on how to effectively implement the process and they must understand their role and responsibilities within the process. Clarify and communicate the process to the entire organization – all employees should understand the processes that are in place to address poor performance. Communicate the process to all employees and frequently provide communication updates so that all employees understand their role and responsibilities within the organization. Train your Managers on how to identify when an employee is languishing – provide your Managers with the tools to identify when an employee is languishing. Help your Managers understand when an intervention may be required help them to ask and find answers to the right questions:
  • Why is this employee failing?
  • It is a lack of skills, poor work ethic or bad attitude?
  • Is their some non-work related cause such as the loss of a loved one, illness or substance abuse?
Foster a Coaching Environment – train your Managers to provide frequent and specific feedback on an ongoing basis. Feedback should not be a one-off event, but a frequent one that helps to identify poor performers early and gets to the root cause of any performance issues. Help your Mangers make professional observations, not personal ones and help them to create a measurable improvement plan.

Addressing Poor Performance is Non-Negotiable – hold your Managers accountable for handling poor performers. Help them to understand the impact that poor performers have on the morale and motivation of all of your employees.

Remember, everyone knows who your poor performers are. If you, as a company, are not willing to address poor performance issues – you risk losing your best performers and creating a safe haven for those that threaten your long-term profitability.

 

 

January 27, 2008

Rule #7 - Good Communication Builds Engagement

microphone.jpgHow many of you really feel informed about what your company is doing? How many of you really believe that your voice is being heard? That your suggestions are taken seriously? How many companies state that they value your opinion, yet they fail to really listen or action any of your comments, suggestions or feedback? We think far too many companies suffer from broken communication promises.

 

Good communication builds employee commitment. Good communication is the foundation upon which trust is built.

 

So what can a company do to ensure that it is building commitment – every day, in every interaction with employees?

 

Provide employees with information about what is going on – how many employees find out about what the company is doing by hearing a company rumor or seeing it on the front page of the newspaper? How many of your employees really understand the link between their job and the overall direction and success of the company?
  • For employees to commit to the organization they must know what is happening in the organization. They must understand the vision and the overall direction of the company. They must understand how their jobs impact into the overall performance of the organization.
Provide employees the opportunity to feed upwards – how many employees really feel that they can talk to their Leaders? How many feel that they have a have the forum to really speak the truth? That they will be listened to?
  • Your employees want to be heard. They want to input into the overall direction of the firm. So be sure to remember to provide them with a way to provide input, comments or suggestions. Be sure to ASK them whether they feel they can feed information upwards. Be sure to ask whether they feel their Leaders are both accessible and listen.
Promote two-way communication – how many of your employees really feel that they have the method to input their suggestions and comments?
  • Be careful the traditional methods of communication which include: bulletin boards, newsletters, procedure manuals and email is not enough to build engaged and committed employees. Your employees want a way to provide their thoughts. They want a response from Management and most importantly they want to see action. A promise to listen and failing to do so will only break the employee-employer bond. So be sure to “walk the walk” and deploy communication methods that enable the employee’s voice to be heard and action to be taken.
Hold you Leaders accountable – how many of Leaders really want to listen? How many of Leaders know how to listen to employees and know how to make them feel valued members of your company?
  • If you are serious about building engaged and committed employees you must hold your Leaders accountable. They must make themselves accessible. They must communicate the vision and they must listen to their employees and take their input seriously. If they don’t – you might as well shelve any hopes of building committed employees.
Every company now brags about – their most valued asset – their employees. But, few are able to translate the rhetoric into engaged and committed employees. If you are truly serious about winning the “war on engagement” look at your communications practices and make sure you are doing everything you can to enhance the commitment that your employees have to your organization. Believe me, you won’t be sorry!

January 25, 2008

Even the Best Can Lose Their Customer Focus!

logo.jpgStarbucks coffee for $1.00? Starbucks is looking to regain its customer focus

Now, I’m a Grande Mild girl so Starbucks coffee for $1.00 will suit me just fine. But, I think the reason why this discounted, perfectly-roasted and Fair Trade coffee headline caught my attention is that Starbucks admits to losing something that the whole Starbucks experience is built on: the customer.

Howard Schultz, newly returned as CEO, has been quoted as saying he believes the company's main problem was that it lost its focus on customers in recent years as it concentrated on growth. Right on. I blogged about this very issue in a November 2007 posting on our site. Customer focus, people. Starbucks lost its customer focus. If it can happen to them, it can happen to you.

With the U.S. recession in full blown force – don’t believe those who say it might happen, it’s here and it’s your customer that will keep you afloat. If your customer can’t live without you and continues to spend you will weather the storm.

So the question dear reader, manager, COO, CEO and Chairman is:  How is your customer focus? What are you doing to  engage your employees to ensure you don’t lose it?

January 24, 2008

Telus Employee Didn't Follow Tribune's #1 Rule

logotelus.jpgA Telus employee did NOT use his best judgment: To tell or not to tell.  

We are in complete agreement with the Tribune’s new and only rule for employee conduct: Rule #1: Use your best judgment. A rule to live by, surely. Yesterday, as I was sipping my coffee, I discovered this little tidbit in the January 23 edition of The Metro newspaper available at all Toronto subway stations.

The headline reads: Overpay causes office discord. The article is from a regularly featured column about the law entitled: Employment Law 101 by Daniel Lublin.Bad judgment emanated from this story in spades.

So here’s the not-using-your-best-judgment story: A Telus employee is sent overseas to work on a project. While he is working overseas, the company pays him an extra supplement called a foreign allowance. The job is completed and the employee returns to Canada and continues to work for Telus in B.C.

You can see where this story is going.

The foreign allowance is never removed from his pay. For four years, this employee received the boost of $25,000 per year and he never says a word. Using your best judgment? I think not. Well, you can guess what happens. Telus’s accounting department finally catches the error and demands the money back - that would be a total of $100,000 – and starts to deduct the money from his pay. Ouch!The employee sues Telus and Telus fires the employee for cause.  

Messy indeed and an obvious case of not using your best judgment.

The employee knew that he was not entitled to receive the foreign allowance in perpetuity despite his denials and the B.C. court agreed. Not only does he have to pay back the $100,000, he also has to pick up Telus’s legal costs.

The moral of this cautionary tale: if you don’t use your best judgment, be prepared to pay.

 

January 23, 2008

Rule #6 - Market to Employees

We have heard it so many times – we are all suffering from information overload. Employees are overwhelmed both internally and externally.

Internally:

  • Employees receive on average 190 communications per day.
  • Most professionals attend 61.8 meetings per month.
  • 80% of the average workday is spent on things that have little or no value.
  • The average manager is said to read one million words per week, which is the equivalent of 1.5 novels per day.
And externally:
  • In the average day, individuals can expect to have contact with around 1,500 trademarked products. And if someone enters a supermarket they come in contact with up to 35,000.
  • There are thousands of TV channels, movies, radio stations, newspapers and magazines.
  • Millions of websites and blogs.
  • There are billions of phone calls faxes, emails all struggling to be heard.

There is just too much information!

So if we all know this – why are so FEW companies doing anything about it? Why do companies continue to mass produce information and place it in boring formats like binders, circulars or procedural documents? The best companies do get it. They understand the importance of not only creating segmented, relevant and engaging information and marketing materials for their customers, but for their employees as well.
 

So what  can you do to engage your employees through communication?

  • Create a personalized, one-to-one relationship with employees. Develop and deliver information and communication messages that not only makes it easier for employees to do their jobs, but speaks to them directly. 
  • Segment the information – One-size doesn’t fit all. We all know that! So segment your employee base and deliver only what is relevant and meaningful to each identified employee segment.
  • Create an employee brand – Every company has different customer - so why not create employee brands. Be sure to make the employee brands relevant, meaningful and engaging.
  • Deliver great design - To be effective information and communication messages must be delivered in an aesthetically stimulating and a functionally effective manner. Media, content, and style should be combined to inspire attention and entertain the targeted employee audience.
  • Make an emotional connection – Develop content that builds both your employees “skills and soul”.  It is no longer enough to push out content and information, focus on building and enhancing confidence, demonstrating integrity and building pride and passion throughout your organization.
  • Create Leaders, not Experts – Your Leaders are overloaded! So be sure to deliver the content and information in an easy to use format that enables the Leader to more effectively conduct short-term transactional interventions – such as coaching.
  • Make it Two-Way – Make sure you listen to your employees. Create mechanisms for them to input into the messages and to tell you how they are feeling.
  • Measure, Measure, Measure – And, never forget to measure the effectiveness of your communications material and content.
Let us know what you would add….

 

 

 

January 22, 2008

Tribune Employee Handbook - Blunt, Engaging

s-SAM-ZELL-large.jpgThe Tribune’s new employee handbook. Why? Because it reflects the company’s new culture – a culture that is led by an Executive that prides himself on being blunt and innovative.

 

Well, there is no doubt that the employee handbook is blunt and engaging, but it is certainly not innovative. Nordstrom led the way with the one rule policy ages ago – Nordstrom’s Rule – Use good judgment in all situations. But, few other companies have been so bold. That is why we like the Tribune’s move to the one rule policy.The handbook starts by outlining the Rules.
  • Rule #1 – Use your best judgment.
  • Rule #2 – See Rule 1.

The handbook starts by highlightings "that yes – that’s it. That is the one hard and fast rule. Unless a serious mistake was made when you were hired, you have pretty good judgment."

We like the way this handbook is laid out. It certainly would capture an employee’s attention. And in a period when employees are overloaded with policies and procedures – this may just be the way to go. What is innovative is the Handbooks' alignment to fostering the company’s creative culture. Here is an example of some of the highlights from the Handbook:
  • 4.2 – Working at Tribune means that accepting that sometimes you might hear a word that you, personally, might not use. You might experience an attitude that you don’t share. You might hear a joke that you might not consider funny. That is because a loose, fun, non-linear atmosphere is important to the creative process.
  • 4.4 – Harassment means that being told that a raise, promotion or other benefit is dependent on you going on a date with your boss or some other similar activity.
  • 5.1 – Personal Relationships – Under Rule #1 you may want to think twice before you enter into an intimate relationship with a co-worker. When you start, it might seem like a good idea. It’s when you stop, or the wrong people find out (and they will) that you discover that perhaps it wasn’t.
  • 7.1 – Drug Policy – If you use or abuse alcohol or drugs and fail to perform the duties of your job acceptably, you are likely to be terminated. See Rule 1. Coming to work drunk is bad judgment.
  • 7.2 – If you do not use or abuse alcohol or drugs and fail to perform the duties required by your job acceptably, you are likely to be terminated.

These are just samples of some of the guidelines in the Handbook. What we like is that they too the point, innovative and provocative.

We wonder what the employees of the Tribune REALLY think of the new Employee Handbook…

 

January 21, 2008

RiseSmart

RiseSmart

Employee Engagement: Results That Matter

Be sure to visit David Zingers insightful blog - Employee Engagement: Results that Matter!

Rule #5 - Employee & Customer Experiences Must be Mirror Images

mirrorimage.jpgEmployees can experience disconnects between what has been promised to them and what they experience. This kind of disconnect can set in motion a downward spiral that may be difficult to pull out from.  
                                                                   Carlson Marketing Group

 

Building an employee experience that creates engaged and committed employees and customers is the key to long-term success. What do we mean by an employee experience? 

An employee experience is a set of beliefs that employees have about a company. It includes the tangibles such as salary and benefits, but also intangibles such as the essence of a company’s culture, ethics, reputation, opportunities for learning, reward and recognition programs, products and services, and the way it values its workers. The employee experience is ultimately what retains and engages employees.

The employee experience must build pride and loyalty. It must be authentic and it must mirror the customer experience. By mirroring the customer experience, we mean that it must faithfully reflect or give a true picture of the customer experience. Here is an example of what we are referring to – Disney has promised to create a friendly environment for its customers. In order to create that environment on the “outside”, Disney recognized that the friendly environment must be created on the inside-first.  

“Walt Disney Productions has been something of an anachronism in major industry by adhering to a first-name, open-door, informal code of behavior for its employees. And yet, these are the proven factors that lead directly to having fun on the job, maintaining a sense of humor and strong sense of internal friendliness. Ultimately, as Walt and Roy knew, it would lead to a strong external friendliness...a friendly efficiency with the public that would pay off in large dividends. No one can create the kind of friendly entertainment product we demand in a formal, unfriendly atmosphere. This important aspect of the Disney philosophy is universally recognized today by the public and press alike. The Wall Street Journal recently wrote that "You can see more respectful, courteous people in Disney World in an afternoon than in New York in a year.”

The quality of an employee experience is the single biggest factor in enabling a company to create meaningful connections with its customers. So what steps can a company follow to create an authentic employee experience?

  • Step I – Start by Identifying the Default Customer Experience. Before anyone can define the desired employee experience it is critical to understand the perception that employees already have of the organization as an employer. Here are four to ask employees that will help you to understand what the current experience looks like: Describe the current employee experience; What makes the organization interesting, valuable or different? What are employees looking for in terms of emotional, rational and economic benefits? What creates meaning for employees?
  • Step II – Define the Experience. The next step is to have the current employee base define the desired employee experience. But be careful, the employee experience should be grounded in the key values of your organization. It can have some developmental aspects, but it should be mainly based on the existing culture and situation.
  • Step III – Build or Refine and Communicate the Employee Experience. Each employee needs to understand how their behavior can impact the entire organization. A deeper understanding of the employee experience will create a sense of ownership and satisfaction that trickles down to the customer experience.
  • Step IV – Measure the Impact. It is critical that every company measures the employee experience and its overall alignment to the customer experience on an ongoing basis.

At The Employee Factor, we know that every company is focused on building customer experiences that create emotionally engaged customers. Those few organizations that have been successful at creating unique experiences and engaged customers have long understood that in order for the customer experience to be delivered consistently it must be mirrored authentically on the inside.

We believe that if an organization truly wants to deliver something different to their customer, they must start to focus on their employee experience and ask themselves a critical question – Are we mirroring the customer experience on the inside? If the answer is “No”, we believe that they shift their focus to the employee experience and watch how the company transforms itself to deliver the desired customer experience – day-in and day-out!

 

January 17, 2008

Female Managers Still Judged on Sensitivity!

Think about it – what do you expect from a male boss versus a female one?   Do you expect the same things regardless of their sex? If you answered yes, think again.

According to Kristin Byron, of the Whitman School of Management “male managers who are perceived as unkind, insensitive and unaware of others' feelings are not considered to be any worse as a result. But woe betide a female manager who displays the same behavior."

According to the findings it seems that female managers may be expected to be sensitive to others’ emotions and to demonstrate this sensitivity by providing emotional support. In contrast, this is not the basis to evaluate the performance of male managers. It is far more important for male managers, and men, in general, to be seen as analytical, logical and good at reasoning than showing care and concern for others.

Let’s think about this for a moment. It is amazing to think that these stereotypes are still pervasive in our society. We still tolerate bosses who are viewed as tough, as long as they are male. And we still expect our female bosses to be maternal, emotional and sensitive.

Let us know what you think…..do you judge a female boss differently than a male one?

January 16, 2008

Death by Overwork - Can a Culture be Changed?

karoshi.jpg 

“Death by overwork” or karoshi (Kah-roe-she) is killing the Japanese Manager in his prime. How? Marathon hours at work lead to heart failure and brain bleeds.

Have you read about this?

We’re talking a lot of overtime. Maybe 100 hours of overtime as estimated by an expert on karoshi.

Take a moment to take that in.

That’s on top of long weekdays, includes evenings and weekends which leaves precious few hours for sleep, meaningful family interaction or a social life.

Quite in contrast to the work/life balance that’s demanded in this country and expected from our own corporate cultures.

Back to Japan…

These overtime hours are unpaid. That’s right, no overtime pay. “Free overtime” as it is called.

So why do these Managers work so hard? It’s expected.

This overwork culture starts at the corporate top and is ingrained in the culture and attitudes of the country and people itself. There is no escaping.

However, the impact is now being felt across Japan. It’s killing the Managers of Japan and leaving families rudderless.

Can a corporate culture be changed?

A recent karoshi court case may have a significant impact as it cuts to the economic heart of the issue: To pay or not to pay for these overtime hours.

The December 19, 2007 Economist Article entitled, “Death by overwork in Japan: Jobs for Life” outlines the recent case of a 30-year-old Toyota Manager who dropped dead in 2002. This young man worked 80 hours a month of overtime for the last six months of his life. Unpaid overtime, of course. Toyota’s position was that these hours were “voluntary”.

The court ruled that these hours were not voluntary which means that he should have been paid for these overtime hours.

Can you see the impact?

Would Toyota expect an employee to work these ridiculous hours if the company had to pay the employee overtime?

The Economist says it succinctly: “The ruling is important because it may increase the pressure on companies to treat “free overtime” (work that an employee is obliged to perform but not paid for) as paid work. That would send shockwaves through corporate Japan, where long, long hours are the norm.”

Will this have an impact on the work/life balance of the Japanese manager?

Only time will tell.

January 15, 2008

Rule #4 - Leaders Must Have the Tools to Foster Engagement

tools.jpgAsking our Leaders to create engaged and committed employees is like praying for a miracle! Without the tools and training, Leaders cannot be expected to create highly engaged and committed employees. Rather, companies must show them the way.

What can a company do to help ensure that their Leaders build engagement levels?

 

  • Lead by example – we know we have said this a lot, but if the top of the house is not role modeling the behaviors than we might as well forget about fostering engagement throughout the company.
  • Share the rationale – not all of your Leaders will understand the importance of creating engaged and committed employees. Make sure you educate them on how engagement drives long term success.
  • Show them how – we all know that we can’t just tell people how to engage employees – we must show them the way. Develop entertaining, interactive, and relevant training modules that help your Leaders understand how their actions and behaviors either build or destroy engagement levels. But remember, your Leaders time is valuable so ensure that you build modules that can be completed and digested in 15 – 30 minute intervals.
  • Provide a framework for engaging employees – for engagement to really take hold, a company must build a framework for Leaders to consistently engage their employees. This framework must help the Leader foster engagement from the time the employee commences employment until they leave the organization. The framework must provide the Leader with a program to build engagement within their teams. This framework must include an on-boarding package; a coaching methodology and framework; performance management tools; a two-way feedback mechanism; and a clear training and development program – just to name a few.
  • Build engagement into daily routines – create 15 minute training huddles that will help the Leader build engagement throughout their teams, by facilitating interaction between members and dialogue. These modules or huddles should include “real life” exercises that help the employees understand the role of their Leader and their role within the organization.
  • Create an anonymous feedback mechanism – we believe that employees need a place to go, if they feel that they can’t speak to or confide in their Leader. This anonymous system must not only provide employees with the confidence they need, but must also have the ability to respond to and action items brought forward by the employee community.

    We all know that far too many organizations promote Leaders and then fail to provide them with the tools and training to do their jobs effectively. The best companies are now recognizing that they must help their Leaders not only understand how to serve their important customer base, but also how to engage their employees.


Let us know your thoughts!

January 14, 2008

Rule #3 - Leaders Must "Know Their Employees"

engaged.jpg “Leadership is everything. Leadership is the single most important factor in our business. Unless the general manager of the shop is leading the team and providing a well managed, secure, well organized and inspirational environment, there is no customer experience.” Andrew Rolfe, Former Chairman - Pret a Manger

So what do we mean when we say that Leaders must have high awareness in order to engage their employees?

 

Awareness means that you are aware of something. Awareness implies vigilance in observing or alertness in drawing inferences from what one experiences. So let’s talk about why Leaders need to have high awareness to create engaged and committed employees.

Think about all of the Leaders that you have had – how many would you “go the extra mile for”? People go the extra mile for people they know, like and can relate to. They go the extra mile for people that understand them and their individual goals and challenges. And they go the extra mile for people that they can relate to, people that take the time to understand them. The same goes for a Leader.

We believe that too few Leaders really take the time to get to know members of their team. We believe that too few Leaders truly understand their employees, and their personal circumstances and challenges. We believe that too few Leaders try to take a walk in their employees’ shoes.

So what can Leaders do to increase their awareness of their employees and their individual goals, aspirations and challenges? Leaders need to:
  • “Walk the Floor” – for Leaders to have high awareness they must walk around and talk to their employees. By this we don’t mean that Leaders simply walk around, we mean that Leaders engage with their employees. They ask how they are doing. They stop and thank them. They ask how they are. And they do it daily.
  • Know Thy Employees – for Leaders to truly engage their employees they must know them. They must understand their individual goals, aspirations and challenges. They must know what is important to each employee. Sound impossible? As a Leader, we believe that you must take the time to get to know your employees – you know it’s important to get to know your customers, so why not your employees – your most valuable asset!
  • Be authentic – people go the extra mile for someone that they know and can relate to. Someone that is real, authentic. For a Leader to truly engage their people – they must be real. They must share personal stories about themselves that their employees can relate to. We are NOT saying that you share everything, but rather things that demonstrate that you are real person.
  • Be accessible – accessibility is critical. If your employees don’t feel that you are accessible then they will never truly engage. Have an open door, welcome people in and be there when someone needs you – it will make a world of difference.
  • Listen and respond – for a Leader to truly engage their employees they must take the time to listen, respond to and implement feedback from their employees. Listening is not enough – a Leader must be seen to take feedback and action it!
At the Employee Factor, we believe that far too many Leaders are not aware of each of their employees and their individual goals and dreams. We believe that far too many Leaders believe that it is not their role to “get to know” their employees. And we believe that as long as an organization allows their Leaders to remain in the “ivory tower” – they will never create fully engaged and committed employees.

 

Let us know your thoughts!

 

January 10, 2008

Rule # 2 - Leaders Must Show Goodwill Toward Others

stockxpertcom_id771729_size1.jpgThere is very little debate about where engagement starts. We all know that it starts at the top, with our Leaders. Read our blog titled “Employee Engagement Starts with Leaders”.

While almost all of us talk about engagement starting at the top – it dawned on me today that while that is critical factor, there is another key element to creating engaged and committed employees. So what is it?

In our opinion, Leaders must be “full of grace”.  What does that mean? It means that to truly create engaged employees a Leader must:

  • Have a disposition to be generous, helpful or show goodwill towards others.
  • Be honest and trustworthy.
  • Listen, have an open mind and never be judgmental.
  • Demonstrate respect to those around them – both inside and outside of the workplace.
  • Never complain – no matter what situation they find themselves in.
  • Be compassionate and understanding, especially to those in need.
  • Always be dependable, and reliable – in others words – they always “do what they say they will do”.
  • Be selfless – never asking or expecting anything in return.
  • Be humble, they must be willing to share the glory and the mistakes.
     

    I would be willing to bet that very few of us have had the fortune of working for a Leader that is truly “full of grace”.  In my life, I have been very fortunate to have worked with several Leaders that have had many of these characteristics. In fact, it is these Leaders that have fueled my passion for helping companies create engaged and committed employees. Let us know, how many of you have worked with Leaders that are truly “full of grace”.

January 04, 2008

I Died Doing a Job I Loved

A fellow blogger, Andrew Olmsted died in Iraq yesterday. Read his final post written prior to his death.

“While you're free to think whatever you like about my life and death, if you think I wasted my life, I'll tell you you're wrong. We're all going to die of something. I died doing a job I loved.”

Remember to always be thankful.

The People Factor

plane.jpg 

Have a look at this video produced by jetBlue.

 

 

 

It will help you to understand how they have created a success story in an industry that has been very hard to succeed in.

 

 

What did they do? They created a core set of values, defined the behaviors associated with living the values and hired accordingly.

 

Watch the video and see why people, training and adhering to core values makes this company a model for all.

 

January 03, 2008

Rule #1 - Employee Engagement is NOT an Initiative

plant.jpg“Brands are destroyed every day, in every interaction, with every customer. A company’s ability to deliver the desired customer experience depends on those at the delivery point both understanding it and feeling compelled to support it. This is a challenge that all company’s face.”
                             &nbs